Loading…
Wednesday, September 6 • 13:30 - 14:00
Power and political positioning in Indigenous evaluation: Exploring the relationship between developmental evaluation and cultural responsiveness in evaluation

Log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

Feedback form is now closed.
Samantha Togni (RMIT Doctoral student)

Evaluation in Indigenous contexts is inherently political. This paper will draw on a decolonising methodologies paradigm to examine culturally responsive evaluation through developmental evaluation in Indigenous settings. It will explore how developmental evaluation operates at the interface of different knowledge systems through examples from practice.

The history of evaluation and evaluation use within Indigenous communities has too often been detrimental to, and marginalised, Indigenous people and communities. Consequently, many Indigenous peoples are sceptical of and mistrust the value of evaluation. In Australia, much evaluation in Indigenous contexts continues to be carried out by non-Indigenous evaluators, raising questions of power and privilege inherent in evaluation. Over the last 15 years evaluation scholars have argued that the recognition of and attention to culture and cultural context in evaluation are essential for improving social programs and undertaking culturally valid evaluation. Partly, this has emerged from a decolonising framework.

Developmental evaluation is designed to support innovation in complex and dynamic contexts where a program or service is emerging. Informed by complexity theory and systems thinking, its essential principles do not explicitly include cultural responsiveness. However, developmental evaluation is relationship-based and pays attention to different perspectives, inter-relationships, context, boundaries and emergence. Within the contexts in which I have applied developmental evaluation it has enabled the recognition and affirmation of different ways of knowing and valuing to inform the innovation development, evaluation design, methods and interpretation of findings. The evaluation has been culturally grounded, the usual power relationships disrupted through co-creation of the innovation and evaluation, and the evaluator being part of the development team.

There is emerging evidence from practice that developmental evaluation can be culturally responsive in its application. However, developmental evaluation is an emerging practice and we need more empirical research to understand its practice, especially in Indigenous and culturally diverse contexts.

Chairs
avatar for Anne Markiewicz

Anne Markiewicz

Director, Anne Markiewicz and Associates
Anne Markiewicz is a leading monitoring, evaluation, and training specialist with over 20 years’ experience designing monitoring and evaluation frameworks and developing and implementing a range of evaluation methodologies. She has designed and delivered M&E capacity development... Read More →

Speakers
LR

Lynne Rogers

Program Coordinator, Inala Indigenous Health
Lynne Rogers is a Program Coordinator working within the Southern Queensland Centre of Excellence in Aboriginal and Primary Health Care, also known as Inala Indigenous Health Service. Lynne has more than 30 years’ experience working for Queensland Health in various areas such as... Read More →
ST

Samantha Togni

Evaluation & Social Research Consultant, S2 Consulting
Samantha Togni is an evaluation and social research consultant based in Alice Springs. She has more than 20 years’ experience in Indigenous health and wellbeing research and evaluation, working with rural and remote Aboriginal organisations in northern and central Australia. Her... Read More →


Wednesday September 6, 2017 13:30 - 14:00 AEST
Derwent Room – first floor